Her intentional use of literary tools and manipulation of the reader and their interest is impressive. She knows how to reel in the reader, pique their interest with an interesting story and then keeps them entertained through out the read, I found that she was good at providing imagery when necessary. Ursula Le Guin knows when to world-build, knows when to keep details out. I would describe her overall style as intentional, deliberate, and descriptive. Le Guin’s use of literary tools helped the overall establishment of the characters, conflicts and setting. This is because her use of tools like imagery expand the novel and fill in the details for the reader. The foreshadowing pull in the reader and entice them to read the story. When she writes “Of these some say the greatest, and surely the greatest voyager, was a man called Sparrowhawk” She then goes on to describe Sparrowhawk’s childhood, and almost dares us to fill in the details. Her use of expanded moments also creates interest by slowing down the pace and focusing on a few key moments in Ged’s life. Overall, her style is interesting and engaging, and her use of literary tools helps her tell the story and get the point across.
The statement that I have the strongest opinion on is the statement “A person or thing must have a name to truly exist”. I wholeheartedly agree with that statement for two main reasons: The first is quite literal, and that is that it is impossible to not have a name for an existing object; the second reason is that names can embody culture and heritage. Firstly, everything that exists has to have a name. Or, everything that we know to exist has a name. I consider names to be glorified labels, hence, everything we are aware of has one. While not all names will be proper nouns, they serve to describe an object, to label it for our convivence. It’s one of the fun nuances of language. As long as language exists, and relatively intelligent life exists that is capable of being aware of it’s surroundings, everything that the mediocre life form is capable of perceiving or observing, everything that they know to exist, has been labeled, giving it a name. Can you think of anything that you know to exist that does not have a name? The second reason I don’t think that things or people cannot exist without a name is because for people names can often hold a small slice of culture. In history, people attempting to erase history, to edit people out of existence, have often tried to take their culture by taking their name. From the Holocaust, where victims where assigned numbers, to Canadian Residential Schools, where Indigenous children’s’ names where stolen and replaced with Catholic names- In cases of cultural genocide, many oppressors understand the power, the history behind traditional names, and try to take this away. However, these despicable acts are rarely effective. While the actions of the oppressors can be traumatic, scaring, and even deadly, humanity is remarkably resilient. We pick ourselves up, and in many cases we reclaim our culture, we reclaim our history. We reclaim our names. Names are one of the few things on this earth that will remain, that will preserve. They are one of the few concepts are irrefutable, a thread between our past, present, and future, and without them, we truly would not exist.
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aj9JTIkibU8jijRksR0AIbDLDUHF – Interview
- Life is incredibly short, so we should take our time, slow down, and try to enjoy it.
- Being a well-rounded individual can assist us in being successful
- Being kind and polite can get us far in life, and can it impact the people around us in a positive way.