How I was mostly able to incorporate the first three aspects of Edward De Bono’s How to Have a Beautiful Mind is through agreeing. Both lectures I went to had very succinct, logical explanations for natural phenomena. In this phase of In-Depth, I am not really focusing on building my own style and opinions, rather, I am focusing on gathering as much information as possible to apply to my later skill-building. I also had a chance to talk with the graduate student we are working with about the traps she is building for her research, and she explained to me why she was using traps made from pop bottles as opposed to the cardboard ones she had in a bag (it has to do with the fact that the box traps need to have a plastic bag on top, and that bag would be compressed by the rain and snow). In terms of disagreeing, I felt the need to investigate saponification further, as it was something I did not believe to be possible. However, I was surprised to learn that even though it was rare, the transformation of the outer layers of the body into a soapy, chalky substance is still possible. In terms of differing, both Dr. Anderson and Dr. Warren talked about the past and present, so there was no hypothetical future to differ on.
1. How might I go about learning Old English? How has the language changed/ stayed the same over time?
2. I have expanded on my language and comprehension skills, as well as my memory skills. My language skills are important for my success in English and German, as I find that learning the sentence structure and vocabulary helps me with other languages. I have improved my comprehension by using context to figure out the harder words that I don’t know, and I can use these skills when learning English and German. My memory will help me in all my subjects because it helps me remember material vital to the course.
3. How has language changed/ stayed the same over time?
– I found that some vocabulary/word stems have remained the same or similar. These include man (Modern English) to mann (Old English) and have to habban. Also, verbs have simplified over time, from many conjugations to just one or two. In addition to that
○ English is now an analytical language
§ Now uses Subject-Verb-Object
4. How might I go about learning Old English?
– I found that writing everything down improves memory and increases comprehension. Using a course provides an outline to follow and provides helpful information on conjugation that is not available online. Also, I found keeping all notes together, prevents me from losing them. My learning project also demonstrates my learning because I am able to demonstrate the changes and similarities between the two languages, as well as the differences. I am also able to demonstrate my learning through the texts and translations, because I am applying all the vocabulary and the sentence structure I have learned to create the artefacts. An important thing to note is that I am not doing a word-by-word translation of the texts, rather, I am doing a sentance-by sentance, so I am trying to preserve all the original meaning, but altering the structure so it fits better into the language. It also connects to my chosen curricular competencies because I used my ability to assess and refine texts to translate the different documents and still keep their meaning while upholding different language conventions and structures. I applied appropriate strategies to comprehend written, oral, visual, and multimodal texts by using my knowledge of reading comprehension stratagies, like reading the word aloud and using the context to understand it, while reading in Old English. I accessed information from a variety of sources and texts, including a course, website, and Old English text to inform my writing and translations through structure and clarity.
i. This site is the course I took. It is run by the University of Texas Linguistics Center, and it was very helpful for me to learn to vocabulary, as well as the sentence structure and grammar rules
i. This website was very helpful for me when writing my introductory blog post. It provided me with a lot of the information about Old English. This included the background, the different dialects, and some of the verbs and sound changes. I found this website a good jumping-off point for my Zip journey.
i. This is one of the translators I used for harder nouns. Some of the vocabulary wasn’t available on the language course, and this was helpful when I was unsure of the word and it’s meaning.
i. I used this site for harder verbs and their conjugations in Old English. I used this site because I did not know many of the different irregular verbs and there conjugations, so this site was invaluable for my learning in that respect.
i. This site was invaluable as it was very useful to tracking down the remaining Old English works. It is a collection of works in Old English, including the poem I am translation.
Some new questions that I have are:
a. Why do some verbs have irregular conjugations?
b. How do historical context and norms influence language?
i. How does the sexist views of the time relate to the different uses of female pronouns and nouns. Eg. Man for man, but different descriptors for females.
c. How has Proto-Germanic influenced all Germanic languages?
These questions excite me because they go into more depth in a subject I am interesting in and excited by. I look forward to pursuing them in my own time.
For my in-depth project, I am studying forensic etymology, crime scene investigation, and a variety of other subjects related to the forensic sciences. The ultimate goal, my learning center for In Depth, is to be able to build a mock crime scene that demonstrates my learning as well as informs others about the field of forensic sciences I chose this project because I am interested in this field, and I have definitely been captivated by the media surrounding forensic sciences, further interesting me.
I hopefully will have several mentors for this project. I am in contact with two forensic science teachers up at SFU, as well as a graduate student who is conducting research and an undergraduate student, who are both involved in the field. I will be taking classes up at SFU starting next week, on Fridays from 10:30-12:30. I will also be doing a forensic sciences course online through EBUS academy (an accredited, four credit online course). I am doing my project in tandem with Grace Kim.
Related to your learning evidence, what have you done to make retrieving information or more effective in class?
To make my work more accessible, I have bookmarked my Old English – Modern English dictionary on my phone and on my computer. I have also bookmarked the course I am taking on both my phone and my computer, to cut down the amount of time I need to set myself up. In addition, I always keep my “Old English Bible” with me at all times, so I can record everything I learn. To make myself more effective, I listen to music that allows me to block out outside distractions better. In terms of retrieving words and grammatical information from my memory, I have gotten into the habit of writing everything down. I have also gotten into the habit of review my notes so it can stick better.
What concepts in your learning do you now feel you have a solid grasp on?
I feel that I have a solid grasp on class I weak verbs, as well as class I strong verbs. I also feel that I have a good grasp of the flow of Old-English, which is different from Modern English in that it has less structure. I also feel that my grasp of (Old English) pronouns and different grammatical cases has greatly improved. I am struggling a bit with class II weak verbs as they follow less rules than class one, but I am allowing myself extra time for practice.
Which ones might be helpful for other students in their learning?
Something that is not necessary helpful, but definitely interesting is the connection between Old English and Modern English. For example, our conjugation of past-tense verbs stems directly from the Old English conjugation of the preterite tense. In weak verbs you conjugate the ending with a -de or -te; which is quite similar to our -ed conjugation. Certain exceptions can be explained through Old English as well. In run/ran, that also mirrors the Old English practice of changing internal vowels to conjugate it for preterite tense in strong verbs.
Take a moment to reflect on your inquiry plan/calendar. Do you need to make any revisions to your original plan? Why?
I do feel that I have to make a few minor adjustments to my inquiry plan. The course that I am taking covers verbs in chunks, going a class at a time. While I have already learned the basic conjugations for class I strong and weak verbs, I would like to amend my plan to learn verbs for longer. Also, nouns are also an ongoing portion of the course, so I would like to amend my timeline to allow for that. In addition to those two changes, I have decided on the texts that I will translate. I would like to do the first chapter of The Philosopher’s Stone, the first Harry Potter book, as it is pretty well known, so a lot of people in my audience will be able to connect with the text. I would also like to translate the first part of the Beowulf epic, as it is widely recognized, but not very well read in my class, so my classmates would be able to get a taste of Old English literature.
Her intentional use of literary tools and manipulation of the reader and their interest is impressive. She knows how to reel in the reader, pique their interest with an interesting story and then keeps them entertained through out the read, I found that she was good at providing imagery when necessary. Ursula Le Guin knows when to world-build, knows when to keep details out. I would describe her overall style as intentional, deliberate, and descriptive. Le Guin’s use of literary tools helped the overall establishment of the characters, conflicts and setting. This is because her use of tools like imagery expand the novel and fill in the details for the reader. The foreshadowing pull in the reader and entice them to read the story. When she writes “Of these some say the greatest, and surely the greatest voyager, was a man called Sparrowhawk” She then goes on to describe Sparrowhawk’s childhood, and almost dares us to fill in the details. Her use of expanded moments also creates interest by slowing down the pace and focusing on a few key moments in Ged’s life. Overall, her style is interesting and engaging, and her use of literary tools helps her tell the story and get the point across.
The statement that I have the strongest opinion on is the statement “A person or thing must have a name to truly exist”. I wholeheartedly agree with that statement for two main reasons: The first is quite literal, and that is that it is impossible to not have a name for an existing object; the second reason is that names can embody culture and heritage. Firstly, everything that exists has to have a name. Or, everything that we know to exist has a name. I consider names to be glorified labels, hence, everything we are aware of has one. While not all names will be proper nouns, they serve to describe an object, to label it for our convivence. It’s one of the fun nuances of language. As long as language exists, and relatively intelligent life exists that is capable of being aware of it’s surroundings, everything that the mediocre life form is capable of perceiving or observing, everything that they know to exist, has been labeled, giving it a name. Can you think of anything that you know to exist that does not have a name? The second reason I don’t think that things or people cannot exist without a name is because for people names can often hold a small slice of culture. In history, people attempting to erase history, to edit people out of existence, have often tried to take their culture by taking their name. From the Holocaust, where victims where assigned numbers, to Canadian Residential Schools, where Indigenous children’s’ names where stolen and replaced with Catholic names- In cases of cultural genocide, many oppressors understand the power, the history behind traditional names, and try to take this away. However, these despicable acts are rarely effective. While the actions of the oppressors can be traumatic, scaring, and even deadly, humanity is remarkably resilient. We pick ourselves up, and in many cases we reclaim our culture, we reclaim our history. We reclaim our names. Names are one of the few things on this earth that will remain, that will preserve. They are one of the few concepts are irrefutable, a thread between our past, present, and future, and without them, we truly would not exist.
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aj9JTIkibU8jijRksR0AIbDLDUHF – Interview
- Life is incredibly short, so we should take our time, slow down, and try to enjoy it.
- Being a well-rounded individual can assist us in being successful
- Being kind and polite can get us far in life, and can it impact the people around us in a positive way.